A Hybrid Group-MCDM Framework for Supplier Selection Problem in Organ Transplantation Networks under an Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environment

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Industrial Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Selecting appropriate suppliers in organ transplant affiliation networks is of critical importance due to its direct impact on service quality and increased life expectancy. This process is recognized as a complex group-multiple criteria decision-making (G-MCDM) problem, involving the evaluation of multiple supplier alternatives based on key criteria for organ transplantation. In this study, a new integrated model is proposed by combining the Borda and CoCoSo methods using Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets (IVFSs) within a group decision-making environment. Leveraging the enhanced capabilities of fuzzy theory, the proposed method effectively addresses the inherent uncertainties present in real-world applications. The weights of the criteria are determined using an interval-valued fuzzy Shannon entropy (IVF-Shannon entropy) method, incorporating expert judgments. Subsequently, the hybrid Borda-CoCoSo approach is employed to rank supplier alternatives for organ transplant equipment within affiliation networks. An application example is presented to assess the performance of the proposed model, and both comparative and sensitivity analyses are conducted to investigate the influence of key parameters on the results. In addition, a comparative evaluation is performed with three existing methods from the literature. The results highlight the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed model in supplier selection and in improving decision-making within the organ transplant supply chain.

Keywords


Abdalla, M. E. M., Uzair, A., Ishtiaq, A., Tahir, M., & Kamran, M. (2025). Algebraic Structures and Practical Implications of Interval-Valued Fermatean Neutrosophic Super HyperSoft Sets in Healthcare. Spectrum of Operational Research2(1), 199-218.
Alabool, H. M. (2025). Large language model evaluation criteria framework in healthcare: fuzzy MCDM approach. SN Computer Science6(1), 57.
Alghawli, A. S. A., Nasser, A. A., & Aljober, M. N. (2021). A fuzzy MCDM approach for structured comparison of the health literacy level of hospitals. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications12(7).
Alsalem, M. A., Albahri, O. S., Zaidan, A. A., Al-Obaidi, J. R., Alnoor, A., Alamoodi, A. H., ... & Jumaah, F. M. (2022). Rescuing emergency cases of COVID-19 patients: an intelligent real-time MSC transfusion framework based on multicriteria decision-making methods. Applied Intelligence, 1-25.
Ashouri, M., Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Jamshidi, A. (2023). An interval valued fuzzy complex proportional assessment (IVF-COPRAS) method to solve MCDM problem with an application. J. Decis. Operat. Res8, 861-871.
Ashtiani, B., Haghighirad, F., Makui, A., & ali Montazer, G. (2009). Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Applied soft computing9(2), 457-461.
Barzegari, M. J., Mousavi, S. M., & Karami, S. (2023). An interval-valued fuzzy MULTIMOOSRAL method for supplier evaluation in oil production projects. Journal of Quality Engineering and Production Optimization8(1), 217-241.
Bouraima, M. B., Jovčić, S., Dobrodolac, M., Pamucar, D., Badi, I., & Maraka, N. D. (2024). Sustainable healthcare system devolution strategy selection using the AROMAN MCDM approach. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications1(1), 46-63.
Chakraborty, S., Raut, R. D., Rofin, T. M., Chatterjee, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2023). A comparative analysis of Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) model for healthcare supplier selection in fuzzy environments. Decision Analytics Journal8, 100290.
Chen, S. J., & Chen, S. M. (2008). Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications55(8), 1670-1685.
Chen, T. C. T., & Lin, C. W. (2022). An FGM decomposition-based fuzzy MCDM method for selecting smart technology applications to support mobile health care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied soft computing121, 108758.‏
Gorzałczany, M. B. (1987). A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and systems21(1), 1-17.
Grattan‐Guinness, I. (1976). Fuzzy membership mapped onto intervals and many‐valued quantities. Mathematical Logic Quarterly22(1), 149-160.
Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Yazdani, M., Ebadi Torkayesh, A., & Derakhti, A. (2020). Application of a gray-based decision support framework for location selection of a temporary hospital during COVID-19 pandemic. Symmetry12(6), 886.
Jalilvand, S., Heidari, S., Mohammadnazari, Z., Aghsami, A., Rabbani, E., & Rabbani, M. (2023). A bi-objective organ transplant supply chain network with recipient priority considering carbon emission under uncertainty, a case study. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability7(4), 709-727.
Karami, S., Mousavi, S. M., & Antucheviciene, J. (2023). Enhancing contractor selection process by a new interval-valued fuzzy decision-making model based on SWARA and cocoso methods. Axioms12(8), 729.
Karnik, N. N., & Mendel, J. M. (2001). Operations on type-2 fuzzy sets. Fuzzy sets and systems122(2), 327-348.
Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., & Tzeng, G. H. (2019). Improving sustainable mobile health care promotion: a novel hybrid MCDM method. Sustainability11(3), 752.
Lo, C. L., Chang, H. Y., & Lee, G. M. (2022). Evaluating Organ Donation Decision in ICU Patients’ Families by Analytic Network Process Approach. Journal of Healthcare Engineering2022(1), 9969604.
Mokhtarian, M. N., Sadi-Nezhad, S., & Makui, A. (2014). A new flexible and reliable IVF-TOPSIS method based on uncertainty risk reduction in decision making process. Applied Soft Computing, 23, 509-520.
Pamucar, D., Torkayesh, A. E., & Biswas, S. (2023). Supplier selection in healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy rough decision-making approach. Annals of Operations Research, 328(1), 977-1019.
Rishabh, R., & Das, K. N. (2025). Selection of a Suitable Healthcare Supplier Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods Hybridized in Metaheuristic Environment. SN Computer Science6(2), 1-17.
Sabripoor, A., Ghousi, R., Najafi, M., Barzinpour, F., & Makui, A. (2024). Risk assessment of organ transplant operation: A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy FMEA. Plos one19(5), e0299655.
Salehi, V., Moradi, G., Omidi, L., & Rahimi, E. (2023). An MCDM approach to assessing influential factors on healthcare providers’ safe performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Probing into demographic variables. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience4(3), 274-283.
Salimian, S., Mousavi, S. M., & Antucheviciene, J. (2022). An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy model based on extended VIKOR and MARCOS for sustainable supplier selection in organ transplantation networks for healthcare devices. Sustainability14(7), 3795.
Salimian, S., Mousavi, S. M., & Turskis, Z. (2023). Transportation mode selection for organ transplant networks by a new multi-criteria group decision model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy uncertainty. Informatica34(2), 337-355.
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & industrial engineering140, 106231.
Su, J., Xu, B., Liu, H., Chen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2025). A Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on CSOGRMILP and Borda-CoCoSo. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1-18.
Yao, J. S., & Lin, F. T. (2002). Constructing a fuzzy flow-shop sequencing model based on statistical data. International journal of approximate reasoning29(3), 215-234.
Yılmaz, B. Ö., Tozan, H., & Karadayı, M. A. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) applications in military healthcare field. Journal of Health Systems and Policies2(2), 149-181.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information sciences8(3), 199-249.
Zimmermann, H. J. (1986). Fuzzy set theory and mathematical programming. Fuzzy sets theory and applications, 99-114.‏